Start with evidence
Use the correct account, connection, meter, tariff and time period before diagnosing a water or billing issue.
Revenue assurance
A practical framework for reverse-flow, seal, bypass and zero-use signals without treating algorithmic alerts as proof of fraud.
Answer first
Tamper and irregular-usage signals should open an evidence-based investigation. Device history, occupancy, field evidence, billing and contradictory evidence should be reviewed before any authorized conclusion.
Outcomes
Use the correct account, connection, meter, tariff and time period before diagnosing a water or billing issue.
Label actual, estimated, inferred and missing data so the reader can see what is known.
Translate the explanation into the next customer, property or utility step.
Capabilities
WaterPesa keeps source IDs, timestamps and calculation versions attached to operational records.
The interface turns raw readings and billing events into an understandable timeline.
When something cannot be resolved from data alone, the same evidence becomes a case or work order.
Authorized users can retain or export the relevant record without relying on screenshots.
“For every cubic metre entering the system: where did it go, what happened commercially, what action was taken, and what measurable result followed?”WaterPesa product invariant · derived from the connected Notion product specification
FAQ
Confirm the account/connection, meter identity, relevant date range and whether the source reading is actual or estimated.
No. The product can surface evidence and anomalies, but field verification or provider review may still be required.
It lets customers and operators explain how a result was produced and prevents later system or meter changes from rewriting the past.
Keep exploring